[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160113221613.GW12897@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 23:16:13 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
X86 Kernel <x86@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 01:54:43PM -0800, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> regmap_update_bits(), which is referenced for 346 times.
I'm at a loss as to why people keep talking about regmap.
$ git grep regmap_update_bits arch/x86/
$
> Are you saying that any such calls are not useful?
It seems I have to repeat myself ad absurdum so let me summarize: I
don't have anything against useful APIs. Those are not.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists