[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87egdk39ji.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 08:27:45 +0100
From: Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>
To: "Yang\, Wenyou" <Wenyou.Yang@...el.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"Kumar Gala" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
"devicetree\@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ferre\, Nicolas" <Nicolas.FERRE@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: act8945a: add regulator driver for ACT8945A
>>>>> "Yang," == Yang, Wenyou <Wenyou.Yang@...el.com> writes:
>> Isn't the regulator part of the act8945a identical to act8865? Can't we just use the
>> existing act8865-regulator.c driver? (E.G. support 8865 variant in the mfd driver,
>> but only register the regulator sub device?)
> Yes, the regulator part of the act8945a is identical to act8865.
> But the act8865-regulator driver is a struct i2c_driver, and the mfd
> sub-device driver is a platform_driver driver, it is not easy to use
> it.
But the mfd driver could support the act8865 variant as well (by only
registering the regulator mfd cell).
--
Venlig hilsen,
Peter Korsgaard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists