linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] mfd: tps65912: Driver rewrite with DT support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:54:30 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	"Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] mfd: tps65912: Driver rewrite with DT support

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Andrew F. Davis <afd@...com> wrote:
>>
>> > Is there anything I can do to help this along? This series
>> > and the tps65086 series have been blocked for months on
>> > trivial issues. (Not sure why the tps65086 hasn't been taken,
>> > it doesn't have this problem, I'd be OK with this getting
>> > stalled for a bit longer if someone could look at the other
>> > one)
>>
>> Lee can you merge the core driver if it's OK? Then we have
>> includes etc in place to merge subdrivers for the next merge
>> window.
>
> It's made more complex than that, due to patch 2 removing code from
> all subsystems.  We probably need to take this in in its entirety, no?

You know way better than me :) go ahead with the best solution
from the MFD point of view I'd say.

Yours,
Linus Walleij