[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5697703F.8040801@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 01:54:07 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] arm: Select GPIO_GENERIC_PLATFORM for CRAGG_6410
On 01/14/2016 01:02 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
>> Since commit 0f4630f3720e ("gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct"),
>> all users of struct bgpio_pdata depend on GPIO_GENERIC.
>>
>> This results in the following build error.
>>
>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c:270:3: warning:
>> excess elements in struct initializer
>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c:270:3: warning:
>> (near initialization for '(anonymous)')
>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c:271:2: error:
>> invalid use of undefined type 'struct bgpio_pdata'
>>
>> Fixes: 0f4630f3720e ("gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct")
>> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>> ---
>> I don't know if this is the correct way to fix this problem.
>> If not, please consider this to be a bug report.
>
> I think this is fixed by Arnds patch:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-gpio&m=145237423205247&w=2
>
> Can you verify that?
>
Correct.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists