[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160114102736.GP6588@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:27:36 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Milo Kim <milo.kim@...com>
Cc: lee.jones@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, j.anaszewski@...sung.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] regulator: add LM363X driver
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 04:56:03PM +0900, Milo Kim wrote:
> So, I'd like to know which is better for you.
> a) Create a patch based on linux-next tree (the above patch)
> Or
> b) Re-generate a patch based on linux-mfd tree
At this point the easiest thing might be to wait for v4.5-rc1 then send
a patch for that after everything gets merged.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists