[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2464004.VfRsJaNrp3@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 02:55:25 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.og>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 3/5] PM core: Make async suspend/resume of devices use device links
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Make the device suspend/resume part of the core system
suspend/resume code use device links to ensure that supplier
and consumer devices will be suspended and resumed in the right
order in case of async suspend/resume.
The idea, roughly, is to use dpm_wait() to wait for all consumers
before a supplier device suspend and to wait for all suppliers
before a consumer device resume.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/base/base.h | 2 +
drivers/base/core.c | 4 +-
drivers/base/power/main.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/base.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/base.h
+++ linux-pm/drivers/base/base.h
@@ -163,3 +163,5 @@ extern void device_links_driver_gone(str
extern void device_links_no_driver(struct device *dev);
extern bool device_links_busy(struct device *dev);
extern void device_links_unbind_consumers(struct device *dev);
+extern int device_links_read_lock(void);
+extern void device_links_read_unlock(int idx);
Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/core.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/core.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -163,12 +163,12 @@ void device_link_del(struct devlink *lin
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_link_del);
-static int device_links_read_lock(void)
+int device_links_read_lock(void)
{
return srcu_read_lock(&device_links_srcu);
}
-static void device_links_read_unlock(int idx)
+void device_links_read_unlock(int idx)
{
return srcu_read_unlock(&device_links_srcu, idx);
}
Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/power/main.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/power/main.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/base/power/main.c
@@ -244,6 +244,62 @@ static void dpm_wait_for_children(struct
device_for_each_child(dev, &async, dpm_wait_fn);
}
+static void dpm_wait_for_suppliers(struct device *dev, bool async)
+{
+ struct devlink *link;
+ int idx;
+
+ idx = device_links_read_lock();
+
+ /*
+ * If the supplier goes away right after we've checked the link to it,
+ * we'll wait for its completion to change the state, but that's fine,
+ * because the only things that will block as a result are the SRCU
+ * callbacks freeing the link objects for the links in the list we're
+ * walking.
+ */
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(link, &dev->consumer_links, c_node)
+ if (link->status != DEVICE_LINK_DORMANT)
+ dpm_wait(link->supplier, async);
+
+ device_links_read_unlock(idx);
+}
+
+static void dpm_wait_for_superior(struct device *dev, bool async)
+{
+ dpm_wait(dev->parent, async);
+ dpm_wait_for_suppliers(dev, async);
+}
+
+static void dpm_wait_for_consumers(struct device *dev, bool async)
+{
+ struct devlink *link;
+ int idx;
+
+ idx = device_links_read_lock();
+
+ /*
+ * The status of a device link can only be changed from "dormant" by a
+ * probe, but that cannot happen during system suspend/resume. In
+ * theory it can change to "dormant" at that time, but then it is
+ * reasonable to wait for the target device anyway (eg. if it goes
+ * away, it's better to wait for it to go away completely and then
+ * continue instead of trying to continue in parallel with its
+ * unregistration).
+ */
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(link, &dev->supplier_links, s_node)
+ if (link->status != DEVICE_LINK_DORMANT)
+ dpm_wait(link->consumer, async);
+
+ device_links_read_unlock(idx);
+}
+
+static void dpm_wait_for_subordinate(struct device *dev, bool async)
+{
+ dpm_wait_for_children(dev, async);
+ dpm_wait_for_consumers(dev, async);
+}
+
/**
* pm_op - Return the PM operation appropriate for given PM event.
* @ops: PM operations to choose from.
@@ -488,7 +544,7 @@ static int device_resume_noirq(struct de
if (!dev->power.is_noirq_suspended)
goto Out;
- dpm_wait(dev->parent, async);
+ dpm_wait_for_superior(dev, async);
if (dev->pm_domain) {
info = "noirq power domain ";
@@ -618,7 +674,7 @@ static int device_resume_early(struct de
if (!dev->power.is_late_suspended)
goto Out;
- dpm_wait(dev->parent, async);
+ dpm_wait_for_superior(dev, async);
if (dev->pm_domain) {
info = "early power domain ";
@@ -750,7 +806,7 @@ static int device_resume(struct device *
goto Complete;
}
- dpm_wait(dev->parent, async);
+ dpm_wait_for_superior(dev, async);
dpm_watchdog_set(&wd, dev);
device_lock(dev);
@@ -1038,7 +1094,7 @@ static int __device_suspend_noirq(struct
if (dev->power.syscore || dev->power.direct_complete)
goto Complete;
- dpm_wait_for_children(dev, async);
+ dpm_wait_for_subordinate(dev, async);
if (dev->pm_domain) {
info = "noirq power domain ";
@@ -1185,7 +1241,7 @@ static int __device_suspend_late(struct
if (dev->power.syscore || dev->power.direct_complete)
goto Complete;
- dpm_wait_for_children(dev, async);
+ dpm_wait_for_subordinate(dev, async);
if (dev->pm_domain) {
info = "late power domain ";
@@ -1357,7 +1413,7 @@ static int __device_suspend(struct devic
TRACE_DEVICE(dev);
TRACE_SUSPEND(0);
- dpm_wait_for_children(dev, async);
+ dpm_wait_for_subordinate(dev, async);
if (async_error)
goto Complete;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists