[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5697DD4C.8010701@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:39:24 -0600
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Keerthy <a0393675@...com>,
Nishanth Menon <menon.nishanth@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marek Belisko <marek@...delico.com>,
Gražvydas Ignotas <notasas@...il.com>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: omap5-board-common: enable rtc and charging
of backup battery
On 01/14/2016 04:01 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday 14 January 2016 04:02 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> On 01/13/2016 01:40 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>
>>> Anyways, considering what's been discussed, after the minimal RTC fix
>>> we could also add code to allow the TWL driver optionally configure the
>>> GPIO. This way the TWL driver could also check the GPIO state in case
>>> some out-of-our-control mystery software goes tweak the msecure pin
>>> state.
>>
>> I dont even know how that will work:
>> If you are using MSECURE as it is intended to be, then you'd mux it to
>> msecure, which means that GPIO read is just a waste of time - you dont
>> even mux it to external world. Now, some SoCs like DRA7 has input lines
>> always connected. even assuming this is for such a case:
>> a) when you are running linux, you are already in nonsecure - it needs
>> no read of MSECURE GPIO to figure that out.
>> b) when you are in secure world, Linux wont be running either.
>>
>> Reading from GPIO is just misguided in my opinion. firewalls are not
>> reconfigured, and muxes are usually done a single time.
>>
>> Or the RTC driver could just check that the bits really change
>>> after= writing them. Then we would at least know things are not working
>>> right for the TWL related RTC drivers.
>>
>> that is reasonable to check, but just a overhead - anyways, just
>> isolated to palmas-rtc.. fail reason maynot always be issues with
>> MSECURE mux.. it could be very well be 32k clk fail etc.. but yeah -
>> that might give a hint that there is an issue..
>>
>
> IIRC without configuring the mux mode of gpio234 to msecure mode we were
> unable to write to the rtc registers. Hence configured it one time at boot.
>
Looks like you missed the code section that shows that the u-boot
configuration was overridden by kernel as GPIO for the very same reason.!
http://git.omapzoom.org/?p=kernel/omap.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap5panda.c;h=6113bc0e04625a1bd794b3f169581c67ad3b42ff;hb=refs/heads/p-linux-omap-3.4#l816
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists