linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 1/8] Track the active utilisation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160115073727.490f97b8@luca-1225C>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jan 2016 07:37:27 +0100
From:	Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/8] Track the active utilisation

On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:49:14 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 04:24:46PM +0100, Luca Abeni wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > index 10f1637..826ca6a 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > @@ -519,6 +519,11 @@ struct dl_rq {
> >  #else
> >  	struct dl_bw dl_bw;
> >  #endif
> > +	/* This is the "active utilization" for this runqueue.
> 
> Incorrect comment style.
Ops... Sorry, I did not realize that I was using the wrong style. I am
locally fixing this and all the other style issues you pointed out.


			Thanks,
				Luca