[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160115005229.GB238@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:52:29 -0500
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"D. Jeff Dionne" <jeff@...inux.org>, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MAINTAINERS: return arch/sh to maintained state,
with new maintainers
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:40:46AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:53:07PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:39:59PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
> > > From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
> > >
> > > Add Yoshinori Sato and Rich Felker as maintainers for arch/sh
> > > (SUPERH).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
> > > Acked-by: D. Jeff Dionne <jeff@...inux.org>
> > > Acked-by: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
> >
> > A much appreciated move,
> >
> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
>
> Likewise,
>
> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
While patch 2/2 still seems to need discussion and resolution, I don't
think this part (1/2, adding us as maintainers) is controversial. Can
it be committed now? Geert? Andrew?
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists