linux-kernel - Re: gianfar: Less function calls in gfar_ethflow_to_filer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5698DC52.4050808@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:47:30 +0100
From:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@...escale.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: gianfar: Less function calls in gfar_ethflow_to_filer_table()
 after error detection

>> * Return directly if a memory allocation failed at the beginning.
>>
>> * Adjust jump targets according to the Linux coding style convention.
>>
>> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Is this really better?
> 
> Perhaps this particular static analysis isn't too useful.

The opinions are still evolving for such a kind of search pattern.


> Why not just allocate once and assign a second pointer?
> 
> 	local_rqfpr = kmalloc_array(2 * (MAX_FILER_IDX + 1),
> 				    sizeof(unsigned int), GFP_KERNEL);
> 	if (!local_rqfpr)
> 		goto err;
> 
> 	local_rqfcr = &local_rqfpr[MAX_FILER_IDX + 1];

Do you suggest to use only one array (instead of two as before) here?

Regards,
Markus