linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] perf record: missing buildid for callstack modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:59:48 -0800
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf record: missing buildid for callstack modules

Peter,

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:27:34PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> > +    *      u32                             filename_len;
>> > +    *      char                            filename[2+];
>
>> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
>
> except of course that sizeof(u32) == 4 :/
There is no padding here. Are you concerned about running out of bits
in filename_len?
Any extension possible because header.size - sizeof(mmap3) -
filename_len sizing what's after filename, right?