[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160115151821.GE6330@kvack.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:18:21 -0500
From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the aio tree
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 01:25:31AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 08:23:16PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Via the aio tree (git://git.kvack.org/~bcrl/aio-next.git#master) added
> > in July 2013 at Ben's request. The code was added to the aio tree in
> > Jan 12 (my time), but has never been in a published linux-next tree due
> > to the above build problem (I back out to the previous days version of
> > the aio tree).
>
> Well, it's code Ben posted a few days ago, which to say it mildly is
> rather controversial. It's cetainly not 4.5 material.
It still needs the exposure.
As for the build failure, it's a bug in the arch __get_user() implementation
that needs to be fixed. __get_user() should really be able to handle 64 bit
types.
-ben
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
> ---end quoted text---
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
Powered by blists - more mailing lists