[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <569913A1.80606@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 18:43:29 +0300
From: Andrey Vostrikov <andrey.vostrikov@...entembedded.com>
To: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: List for communicating with real GTA04 owners
<gta04-owner@...delico.com>, tomeu@...euvizoso.net,
NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Marek Belisko <marek@...delico.com>
Subject: Re: [Gta04-owner] [PATCH 0/4] UART slave device support - version 4
Hi Nikolaus,
H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> And IMHO nobody has described that he/she needs a solution to model the*data* relationship
> for devices connected behind a tty port.
I am not sure if my case fits *data* relationship or not in this case. Some time ago I asked about state of your patches.
In my case I have supervising microcontroller unit (MCU) that is connected to one of UARTs on SoC.
This MCU implements several functions that will be implemented as MFD driver:
- watchdog and system reset
- NVMEM EEPROM
- HWMON sensors
- Input/power button
- and similar low level functions
So in my case DTS binding looks like:
&uart3 {
mcu {
line-speed = <baud rate>;
watchdog {
timeout = <ms>;
...other params...
};
eeprom {
#address-cells
#size-cells
cell1 : cell@1 {
reg = <1 2>;
};
cell2 : cell@2 {
reg = <2 1>;
};
};
hwmon {
sensors-list = "voltage", "current", etc...;
}
}
}
This MCU receives commands and notifies MFD driver about events via UART protocol.
It looks like not really a slave though, more like a partnership from data flow point of view.
There is no user space code involved in this case as whole interactions are between drivers (just a kick to open /dev/ttyXXX using sys_open, as there is no way to start probe on uart_slave bus and assign line discipline).
Best regards,
Andrey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists