[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160115164023.GH3520@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:40:23 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org >> Linux Kernel Mailing List"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: regression 4.4: deadlock in with cgroup percpu_rwsem
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 08:30:43AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 01/14/2016 08:56 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the report and detailed analysis. Can you please
> > test whether the following patch fixes the issue?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
>
>
> Yes, the deadlock is gone and the system is still running.
> After some time I had the following WARN in the logs, though.
> Not sure yet if that is related.
Hmmm... doesn't seem to be related. I'll spruce up the patch and
route it through cgroup tree w/ stable cc'd. Please keep me posted on
the lockdep issue.
Thanks!
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists