linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH V3 0/2] AMD NTB V3 changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <000001d14fb7$e7981bd0$b6c85370$@emc.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:12:24 -0500
From:	"Allen Hubbe" <Allen.Hubbe@....com>
To:	"'Yu, Xiangliang'" <Xiangliang.Yu@....com>, <jdmason@...zu.us>,
	<dave.jiang@...el.com>, <linux-ntb@...glegroups.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	"'SPG_Linux_Kernel'" <SPG_Linux_Kernel@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 0/2] AMD NTB V3 changes

> From: Yu, Xiangliang <Xiangliang.Yu@....com>

> I want to add flush function into ntb_transport.c, but I can't verify
> the implementation

Ok.  That's a good reason to hold back the flush mechanism: it's not been tested.

Nak (for now): [PATCH V3 2/2] NTB: Add support for flush request interface

Don't give up.  Please keep working on this, and the power management patch, to get them reviewed and accepted.  It's your choice whether or not to submit the patches, and when.  I'd encourage you to do it early, rather than delay.

Allen