[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1452902519-2754-162-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:59:35 -0800
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 161/305] um: Fix get_signal() usage
4.2.8-ckt2 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
---8<------------------------------------------------------------
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
commit db2f24dc240856fb1d78005307f1523b7b3c121b upstream.
If get_signal() returns us a signal to post
we must not call it again, otherwise the already
posted signal will be overridden.
Before commit a610d6e672d this was the case as we stopped
the while after a successful handle_signal().
Fixes: a610d6e672d ("pull clearing RESTORE_SIGMASK into block_sigmask()")
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
arch/um/kernel/signal.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/signal.c b/arch/um/kernel/signal.c
index 4f60e4a..50b6e9f 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/signal.c
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static int kern_do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
struct ksignal ksig;
int handled_sig = 0;
- while (get_signal(&ksig)) {
+ if (get_signal(&ksig)) {
handled_sig = 1;
/* Whee! Actually deliver the signal. */
handle_signal(&ksig, regs);
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists