linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 141/305] dm btree: fix leak of bufio-backed block in btree_split

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1452902519-2754-142-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:59:15 -0800
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 141/305] dm btree: fix leak of bufio-backed block in btree_split_sibling error path

4.2.8-ckt2 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

---8<------------------------------------------------------------

From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>

commit 30ce6e1cc5a0f781d60227e9096c86e188d2c2bd upstream.

The block allocated at the start of btree_split_sibling() is never
released if later insert_at() fails.

Fix this by releasing the previously allocated bufio block using
unlock_block().

Reported-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree.c b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree.c
index d6e4703..7ba85e2 100644
--- a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree.c
+++ b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree.c
@@ -471,8 +471,10 @@ static int btree_split_sibling(struct shadow_spine *s, dm_block_t root,
 
 	r = insert_at(sizeof(__le64), pn, parent_index + 1,
 		      le64_to_cpu(rn->keys[0]), &location);
-	if (r)
+	if (r) {
+		unlock_block(s->info, right);
 		return r;
+	}
 
 	if (key < le64_to_cpu(rn->keys[0])) {
 		unlock_block(s->info, right);
-- 
1.9.1