linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 160/305] fix the regression from "direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1452902519-2754-161-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:59:34 -0800
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 160/305] fix the regression from "direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof"

4.2.8-ckt2 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

---8<------------------------------------------------------------

From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>

commit 2d4594acbf6d8f75a27f3578476b6a27d8b13ebb upstream.

Sure, it's better to bail out of past-the-eof read and return 0 than return
a bogus negative value on such.  Only we'd better make sure we are bailing out
with 0 and not -ENOMEM...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 fs/direct-io.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
index 6bc4bac..d83a021 100644
--- a/fs/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/direct-io.c
@@ -1165,6 +1165,7 @@ do_blockdev_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct inode *inode,
 		if (dio->flags & DIO_LOCKING)
 			mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
 		kmem_cache_free(dio_cache, dio);
+		retval = 0;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-- 
1.9.1