linux-kernel - [tip:x86/urgent] x86/irq: Clear move_in

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-c1684f5035b60e9f98566493e869496fb5de1d89@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:19:19 -0800
From:	tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	bp@...en8.de, joe.lawrence@...atus.com, mingo@...nel.org,
	hpa@...or.com, jmmahler@...il.com, jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux@...ck-us.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/irq:
  Clear move_in_progress before sending cleanup IPI

Commit-ID:  c1684f5035b60e9f98566493e869496fb5de1d89
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/c1684f5035b60e9f98566493e869496fb5de1d89
Author:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 16:30:51 +0000
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:44:01 +0100

x86/irq: Clear move_in_progress before sending cleanup IPI

send_cleanup_vector() fiddles with the old_domain mask unprotected because it
relies on the protection by the move_in_progress flag. But this is fatal, as
the flag is reset after the IPI has been sent. So a cpu which receives the IPI
can still see the flag set and therefor ignores the cleanup request. If no
other cleanup request happens then the vector stays stale on that cpu and in
case of an irq removal the vector still persists. That can lead to use after
free when the next cleanup IPI happens.

Protect the code with vector_lock and clear move_in_progress before sending
the IPI.

This does not plug the race which Joe reported because:

CPU0                          CPU1                      CPU2
lock_vector()
data->move_in_progress=0
sendIPI()                       
unlock_vector()
                              set_affinity()
                              assign_irq_vector()
                              lock_vector()             handle_IPI
                              move_in_progress = 1      lock_vector()
                              unlock_vector()
                                                        move_in_progress == 1

The full fix comes with a later patch.

Reported-and-tested-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...atus.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@...il.com>
Cc: andy.shevchenko@...il.com
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org #4.3+
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151231160106.892412198@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
index 68d18b3..ed62f9c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
@@ -532,6 +532,8 @@ static void __send_cleanup_vector(struct apic_chip_data *data)
 {
 	cpumask_var_t cleanup_mask;
 
+	raw_spin_lock(&vector_lock);
+	data->move_in_progress = 0;
 	if (unlikely(!alloc_cpumask_var(&cleanup_mask, GFP_ATOMIC))) {
 		unsigned int i;
 
@@ -543,7 +545,7 @@ static void __send_cleanup_vector(struct apic_chip_data *data)
 		apic->send_IPI_mask(cleanup_mask, IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR);
 		free_cpumask_var(cleanup_mask);
 	}
-	data->move_in_progress = 0;
+	raw_spin_unlock(&vector_lock);
 }
 
 void send_cleanup_vector(struct irq_cfg *cfg)