[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1601181205110.16178@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 12:38:55 +0000
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To: <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, <stefano.stabellini@...rix.com>,
<david.vrabel@...rix.com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
<catalin.marinas@....com>, <will.deacon@....com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
<julien.grall@...rix.com>, <shannon.zhao@...aro.org>,
<peter.huangpeng@...wei.com>, <zhaoshenglong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 08/16] xen/hvm/params: Add a new delivery
type for event-channel in HVM_PARAM_CALLBACK_IRQ
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@...aro.org>
>
> Add a new delivery type:
> val[63:56] == 3: val[15:8] is flag: val[7:0] is a PPI.
> To the flag, bit 0 stands the interrupt mode is edge(1) or level(0) and
> bit 1 stands the interrupt polarity is active low(1) or high(0).
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@...aro.org>
> ---
> include/xen/interface/hvm/params.h | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/xen/interface/hvm/params.h b/include/xen/interface/hvm/params.h
> index a6c7991..550688a 100644
> --- a/include/xen/interface/hvm/params.h
> +++ b/include/xen/interface/hvm/params.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,11 @@
> * Domain = val[47:32], Bus = val[31:16],
> * DevFn = val[15: 8], IntX = val[ 1: 0]
> * val[63:56] == 2: val[7:0] is a vector number.
> + * val[63:56] == 3: val[15:8] is flag of event-channel interrupt:
> + * bit 0: interrupt is edge(1) or level(0) triggered
> + * bit 1: interrupt is active low(1) or high(0)
> + * val[7:0] is PPI number used by event-channel.
> + * This is only used by ARM/ARM64.
> * If val == 0 then CPU0 event-channel notifications are not delivered.
> */
> #define HVM_PARAM_CALLBACK_IRQ 0
Andrew, I think that this patch is correct. Looking back at your
previous comment (http://marc.info/?l=devicetree&m=144804014214262&w=2),
is it possible that you were confused by enum callback_via_type, which
is internal to Xen and offset'ed by 1 compared to the described values
in xen/include/public/hvm/params.h?
If not, and indeed somebody introduced one more field but failed to
document it, then I suggest she sends a patch to fix the issue as soon
as possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists