linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] tty/serial: atmel: Include module.h to fix build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160118170423.GA25394@sudip-laptop>
Date:	Mon, 18 Jan 2016 22:34:38 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	postmaster <postmaster@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] tty/serial: atmel: Include module.h to fix build
 failure

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 08:36:38AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 01/13/2016 02:32 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:44:10PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> >>On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 21:35 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>On 01/11/2016 07:08 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >>>>On 2016-01-11 06:11 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>>>On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:05:36PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >>>>>>On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:29:08AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>>>>>>On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:15:35AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>>>>>>If serial/atmel_serial.c is compiled with devicetree enabled, the
> ><snip>
> >>>
> >>>Sudip, one option would be to set up a semi-private mailing list.
> >>>My build tests now have a dedicated virtual host (kerneltests.org).
> >>>I could set up a managed list there.
> >>
> >>Perhaps it'd be better to have something like linux-build-failures@...r.kernel.org
> >
> >yes, much better. But if me and Guenter are the only two members of that
> >list then it will not look nice. :)
> >
> 
> How about just using kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org ? That list already exists and,
> for all practical purposes, has been abandoned.

Great. I am subscribing to it.

regards
sudip