[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1453087115.52350626@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 03:18:35 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"Nikolay Aleksandrov" <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
"Michał Mirosław"
<mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 39/70] net/core: revert "net: fix __netdev_update_features
return.." and add comment
3.2.76-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
commit 17b85d29e82cc3c874a497a8bc5764d6a2b043e2 upstream.
This reverts commit 00ee59271777 ("net: fix __netdev_update_features return
on ndo_set_features failure")
and adds a comment explaining why it's okay to return a value other than
0 upon error. Some drivers might actually change flags and return an
error so it's better to fire a spurious notification rather than miss
these.
CC: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
net/core/dev.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5446,7 +5446,10 @@ int __netdev_update_features(struct net_
netdev_err(dev,
"set_features() failed (%d); wanted 0x%08x, left 0x%08x\n",
err, features, dev->features);
- return 0;
+ /* return non-0 since some features might have changed and
+ * it's better to fire a spurious notification than miss it
+ */
+ return -1;
}
if (!err)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists