linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] power: Add support for TI BQ24261 charger

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Jan 2016 09:02:32 +0200
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:	"Pallala, Ramakrishna" <ramakrishna.pallala@...el.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
	"Tc, Jenny" <jenny.tc@...el.com>,
	Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] power: Add support for TI BQ24261 charger

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Pallala, Ramakrishna
<ramakrishna.pallala@...el.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Ramakrishna Pallala
>> <ramakrishna.pallala@...el.com> wrote:
>> > Add new charger driver support for TI BQ24261 charger IC.
>> >
>> > TI BQ24261 charger driver relies on extcon notifications to get the
>> > charger cable type and based on that it will set the charging parameters.

>> > +/* BQ24261 registers */
>> > +#define BQ24261_STAT_CTRL0_ADDR                0x00
>> > +#define BQ24261_CTRL_ADDR              0x01
>> > +#define BQ24261_BATT_VOL_CTRL_ADDR     0x02
>> > +#define BQ24261_VENDOR_REV_ADDR                0x03
>> > +#define BQ24261_TERM_FCC_ADDR          0x04
>> > +#define BQ24261_VINDPM_STAT_ADDR       0x05
>> > +#define BQ24261_ST_NTC_MON_ADDR                0x06
>> > +
>> > +#define BQ24261_RESET_ENABLE           BIT(7)
>> > +
>>
>> Might be a good idea to put comment line preceded each group to refer which
>> register it covers.
> Ok.
>
>>
>> > +#define BQ24261_FAULT_MASK             GENMASK(2, 0)
>>
>> Either use GENMASK in each case, or put plain number.
>>
> Ok.

Looking to your definitions again I can say that GENMASK is more
readable. Regarding to BIT() macro you have to do smart choice in each
case separately.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko