linux-kernel - Re: virtio pull for 4.5 (was Re: [PULL] virtio: barrier rework+fixes)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFyh_1Lpp4U2wsFJQu_4PmSBD=36YeAhQN94L4GUhQrb2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Jan 2016 17:01:26 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:	KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
	Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
	Cc: dave@...olabs.net, davem@...emloft.net, david.vrabel@...rix.com, dbueso@...e.de, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, james.hogan@...tec.com, joe@...ches.com, julian.calaby@...il.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk, minchan@...nel.org, mingo@...nel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org, richard@....at, rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk, schwidefsky@...ibm.com, stable@...r.kernel.org, stefanha@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, 
	<tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: virtio pull for 4.5 (was Re: [PULL] virtio: barrier rework+fixes)

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
> Just making sure nothing's wrong with this pull request.
> If there's an issue, pls let me know!

It was just pulled because I wasn't 100% sure I wanted the extra
indirection. Oh well, pulled now.

One question:

 - the arch/sh/ part of the pacth looks dubious. Why does it do that

     #define smp_store_mb(var, value) __smp_store_mb(var, value)

   despite the commit log saying it's done by asm-generic?

I haven't pushed out yet, my allmodconfig sanity-check build is still going..

                      Linus