[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160119094543.GC15071@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 10:45:43 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>,
Thomas Voegtle <tv@...96.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] CONFIG_FORCE_MINIMALLY_SANE_CONFIG=y (was: Re: [RFC PATCH]
x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during oldconfig)
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 09:54:12AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> The key point is that I'd like "naively configured" kernels to work on
> just about any Linux distro that allow kernel testing
Vehemently yes!
This is magnitudes more important than having a couple of passive
kilobytes dangling in the kernel image.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists