[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160119100511.GA15503@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:05:11 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@...el.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>, tbaicar@...eaurora.org,
rruigrok@...eaurora.org,
"Abdulhamid, Harb" <harba@....qualcomm.com>,
G Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Linaro ACPI Mailman List <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] acpi, apei: add Boot Error Record Table (BERT) support
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:09:40PM +0800, Fu Wei wrote:
> My personal opinion is :
> This driver will be used on various platforms, this marker can tell user there
> is some bug in firmware, maybe user can disable BERT next time to avoid
> this noise before develop have chance to fix it.
> And BIOS vendors also can get info from that, and fix their crap :-)
>
> If user see this, maybe he should disable BERT on his platform temporary.
>
> Is that a good reason to keep it?
I guess.
Ok, let's leave it in, we can always remove it later. It's not like the
kernel is BIOS and cannot be changed anymore :-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists