[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <569D9634.3040304@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 09:49:40 +0800
From: "liudongdong (C)" <liudongdong3@...wei.com>
To: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>, Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
<bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <arnd@...db.de>, <will.deacon@....com>,
<catalin.marinas@....com>, <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
<hanjun.guo@...aro.org>, <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
<okaya@...eaurora.org>, <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
<Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>
CC: <robert.richter@...iumnetworks.com>, <mw@...ihalf.com>,
<Liviu.Dudau@....com>, <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
<Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>, <jchandra@...adcom.com>,
<jcm@...hat.com>, Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>,
Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 20/21] pci, acpi: Match PCI config space accessors
against platfrom specific quirks.
Hi Tomasz, Mark
在 2016/1/18 20:41, Tomasz Nowicki 写道:
> On 14.01.2016 16:36, Mark Salter wrote:
>>> +extern struct pci_mcfg_fixup __start_acpi_mcfg_fixups[];
>>> >+extern struct pci_mcfg_fixup __end_acpi_mcfg_fixups[];
>>> >+
>>> >+static struct pci_ops *pci_mcfg_check_quirks(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
>>> >+{
>>> >+ struct pci_mcfg_fixup *f;
>>> >+ int bus_num = root->secondary.start;
>>> >+ int domain = root->segment;
>>> >+
>>> >+ /*
>>> >+ * First match against PCI topology <domain:bus> then use DMI or
>>> >+ * custom match handler.
>>> >+ */
>>> >+ for (f = __start_acpi_mcfg_fixups; f < __end_acpi_mcfg_fixups; f++) {
>>> >+ if ((f->domain == domain || f->domain == PCI_MCFG_DOMAIN_ANY) &&
>>> >+ (f->bus_num == bus_num || f->bus_num == PCI_MCFG_BUS_ANY) &&
>>> >+ (f->system ? dmi_check_system(f->system) : 0 ||
>>> >+ f->match ? f->match(f, root) : 0))
>>> >+ return f->ops;
>> I think this would be better as:
>>
>> (f->system ? dmi_check_system(f->system) : 1 &&
>> f->match ? f->match(f, root) : 1))
>> return f->ops;
>>
>> Otherwise, one has to call dmi_check_system() from f->match() if
>> access to root is needed.
>
Non-DMI, we need not to call dmi_check_system() from f->match(),
we can use _HID to decide to hook the pci_ops or not.
Device (PCI1)
{
Name (_HID, "HISI0080") // PCI Express Root Bridge
Name (_CID, "PNP0A03") // Compatible PCI Root Bridge
...
}
static const struct acpi_device_id hisi_pcie_ids[] = {
{"HISI0080", 0},
{"", 0},
};
static int hisi_pcie_match(struct pci_mcfg_fixup *fixup, struct acpi_pci_root *root)
{
int ret;
struct acpi_device *device;
device = root->device;
ret = acpi_match_device_ids(device, hisi_pcie_ids);
if (ret)
return 0;
......
return 1;
}
static struct pci_ops hisi_ecam_pci_ops = {
.map_bus = pci_mcfg_dev_base,
.read = hisi_pci_read,
.write = hisi_pci_write,
};
DECLARE_ACPI_MCFG_FIXUP(NULL, hisi_pcie_match, &hisi_ecam_pci_ops,
PCI_MCFG_DOMAIN_ANY, PCI_MCFG_BUS_ANY);
Thanks
Dongdong
> Makes a lot of sense to me, I will modify as you suggested.
>
> Tomasz
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists