[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160119100027.3e341530@icelake>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 10:00:27 -0800
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:06:05 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> > If we just look at 20% forced idle, I can see significantly more
> > deep package C-states(PC7) residency.
> > Pkg%pc2 Pkg%pc6 Pkg%pc7
> > w/o patch 3.17 4.39 13.21
> > w/ patch 1.15 1.43 17.24
>
> Can this be translated to: "this patch improved power efficiency
> (watts per second) by XYZ percent?", with XYZ filled in accordingly?
With CPU bound workload and 20% idle injection ratio, this patch
improves performance per watt by 3.2% on Ivy Bridge system with
Package C7 as the deepest idle.
The above packages C-state residency explains why, i.e. more deeper PC7
when tick is stopped.
With newer CPUs, this improvements should be more visible in that
low power package C-states are getting deeper/less power. I will test
on Skylake client as soon as I have time.
Thanks,
Jacob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists