lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1601191918470.2531@hadrien>
Date:	Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:54:20 +0100 (CET)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>
cc:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, bh74.an@...sung.com,
	ks.giri@...sung.com, vipul.pandya@...sung.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	shuahkh@....samsung.com
Subject: Re: question about samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_xpcs.c



On Tue, 19 Jan 2016, Shuah Khan wrote:

> 2016-01-19 9:26 GMT-07:00 Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was windering what is the purpose of the file
> > drivers/net/ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_xpcs.c
>
> From git log and comments, it appears this driver is for
> Samsung SoCs.
>
> >
> > I can't find anything that refers to it, and if I remove it from the
> > makefile:
> >
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SXGBE_ETH) += samsung-sxgbe.o
> >  samsung-sxgbe-objs:= sxgbe_platform.o sxgbe_main.o sxgbe_desc.o \
> >                 sxgbe_dma.o sxgbe_core.o sxgbe_mtl.o  sxgbe_mdio.o \
> > -               sxgbe_ethtool.o sxgbe_xpcs.o $(samsung-sxgbe-y)
> > +               sxgbe_ethtool.o $(samsung-sxgbe-y)
> >
> > and then make clean and recompile, I see no bad effect.
> >
>
> What is the motivation for the experiment to remove it?
> This file probably gets used only on Samsung SoCs.

I just wondered.  I was looking at dependencies between networking files.
This one stands out because nothing is dependenton it, even the files it
is compiled with, and it doesn't contain the usual functions,
register_netdev, etc.

Thanks for the explanation.

julia

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ