[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160119202513.GC6510@localhost>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 14:25:13 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Graeme Gregory <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, okaya@...eaurora.org,
wangyijing@...wei.com, Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>, ddaney@...iumnetworks.com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, robert.richter@...iumnetworks.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, jcm@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de,
Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com, Liviu.Dudau@....com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mw@...ihalf.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, jchandra@...adcom.com,
rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hanjun.guo@...aro.org, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com,
jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 00/21] MMCONFIG refactoring and support for ARM64 PCI
hostbridge init based on ACPI
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 02:04:05PM +0000, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:12:31PM +0000, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 09:24:41AM -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 14:15 +0000, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 09:01:40AM -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 13:44 +0000, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 02:20:46PM +0100, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> > > > > > > From the functionality point of view this series might be split into the
> > > > > > > following logic parts:
> > > > > > > 1. Make MMCONFIG code arch-agnostic which allows all architectures to collect
> > > > > > > PCI config regions and used when necessary.
> > > > > > > 2. Move non-arch specific bits to the core code.
> > > > > > > 3. Use MMCONFIG code and implement generic ACPI based PCI host controller driver.
> > > > > > > 4. Enable above driver on ARM64
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Patches has been built on top of 4.4 and can be found here:
> > > > > > > git@...hub.com:semihalf-nowicki-tomasz/linux.git (pci-acpi-v3)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > NOTE, this patch set depends on Matthew's patches:
> > > > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg45950.html
> > > > > > > https://github.com/Vality/linux/tree/pci-fixes
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This has been tested on Cavium ThunderX server and QEMU.
> > > > > > > Any help in reviewing and testing is very appreciated.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have tested this on my AMD Overdrive so
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tested-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But to actually get my r8169 network card working I also need the
> > > > > > following patch.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > > > > > index 2fbf840..40e24e2 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > > > > > @@ -1717,7 +1717,7 @@ void pci_device_add(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_bus *bus)
> > > > > > set_dev_node(&dev->dev, pcibus_to_node(bus));
> > > > > > dev->dev.dma_mask = &dev->dma_mask;
> > > > > > dev->dev.dma_parms = &dev->dma_parms;
> > > > > > - dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = 0xffffffffull;
> > > > > > + dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
> > > > > > pci_dma_configure(dev);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > pci_set_dma_max_seg_size(dev, 65536);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I suspect we need to set coherent_dma_mask somewhere in the platform but I do
> > > > > > not know where this should happen. Hopefully an ARM64 expert can help.
> > > > >
> > > > > I've run into a number of cards which don't work on some arm64 machines where there are
> > > > > no DMA address below 4G. For the realtek card you can use r8169.use_dac=1 on the cmdline
> > > > > to get it to work.
> > > > >
> > > > I need r8169.use_dac=1 and this patch to get card to work.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hmm. I didn't need a patch in the past but I don't think I've used that card with
> > > this patch series. I will try that when I get a chance...
> > >
> >
> > From my previous debugging on this issue I was getting an address bigger
> > than 32bits. As r8169 is a whole range of chips are guess they are not
> > all equal?
> >
> > I can stick debug stuff in if someone tells me where to put them.
> >
>
> After some private debugging with Mark it turned out that the difference
> between our configurations was I did not have.
>
> CONFIG_DMA_CMA=y
>
> With this enabled then the card works without coherent mask hack.
I didn't follow the whole discussion here, but is this a case where
the driver could fail more gracefully than it did? Can we do anything
to make this easier for the next person who trips over the same problem?
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists