[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyum2kiJNyHwT-wrFtRZC0G7qwWXPTK_dkaEme2Y3kNmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:07:15 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Марк Коренберг
<socketpair@...il.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lkp@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] pipe: limit the per-user amount of pages allocated in pipes
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> wrote:
> On no-so-small systems, it is possible for a single process to cause an
> OOM condition by filling large pipes with data that are never read. A
> typical process filling 4000 pipes with 1 MB of data will use 4 GB of
> memory. On small systems it may be tricky to set the pipe max size to
> prevent this from happening.
>
> This patch makes it possible to enforce a per-user soft limit above
> which new pipes will be limited to a single page, effectively limiting
> them to 4 kB each, as well as a hard limit above which no new pipes may
> be created for this user. T
Al, should I take this directly, or is it coming through your tree?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists