linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/13] aio: enabled thread based async fsync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzRo3yztEBBvJ4CMCvVHAo6qEDhTHTc_LGyqmxbcFyNYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:59:35 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Cc:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-aio@...ck.org,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] aio: enabled thread based async fsync

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org> wrote:
>>
>> I'll have to think about this some more.
>
> Any further thoughts on this after a few days worth of pondering?

Sorry about the delay, with the merge window and me being sick for a
couple of days I didn't get around to this.

After thinking it over some more, I guess I'm ok with your approach.
The table-driven patch makes me a bit happier, and I guess not very
many people end up ever wanting to do async system calls anyway.

Are there other users outside of Solace? It would be good to get comments..

            Linus