linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: act8945a: add regulator driver for ACT8945A

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <B256D81BAE5131468A838E5D7A243641D63F6228@penmbx01>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2016 07:37:36 +0000
From:	"Yang, Wenyou" <Wenyou.Yang@...el.com>
To:	Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>
CC:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	"Kumar Gala" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Ferre, Nicolas" <Nicolas.FERRE@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: act8945a: add regulator driver for
 ACT8945A

Hi Peter,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Korsgaard [mailto:jacmet@...il.com] On Behalf Of Peter Korsgaard
> Sent: 2016年1月14日 19:43
> To: Yang, Wenyou <Wenyou.Yang@...el.com>
> Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>; Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>;
> Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>; Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>; Mark
> Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>; Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>;
> Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; Ferre, Nicolas
> <Nicolas.FERRE@...el.com>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Javier Martinez
> Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>; Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>; linux-arm-
> kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: act8945a: add regulator driver for
> ACT8945A
> 
> >>>>> "Yang," == Yang, Wenyou <Wenyou.Yang@...el.com> writes:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> >>
>  >>> Isn't the regulator part of the act8945a identical to act8865? Can't we just
> use  >>> the existing act8865-regulator.c driver? (E.G. support 8865 variant in the
> mfd  >>> driver, but only register the regulator sub device?)  >>  >> > Yes, the
> regulator part of the act8945a is identical to act8865.
>  >>
>  >> > But the act8865-regulator driver is a struct i2c_driver, and the mfd  > sub-
>   >> device driver is a platform_driver driver, it is not easy to use  > it.
>  >>
>  >> But the mfd driver could support the act8865 variant as well (by only
> registering  >> the regulator mfd cell).
> 
>  > I still don't understand.
> 
>  > The MFD sub device is registered as a platform device, the existing  > act8865
> driver is registered as an i2c_driver. How do they match? :)
> 
>  > Could you point out which exiting driver for me to reference.  Thank you!
> 
> What I'm saying is that it isn't nice that we end up with both act8865-regulator.c
> and act8954-regulator.c doing 95% the same. This can either be fixed by:
> 
> - Adding act8865 support to your mfd driver (but only registering the
>   regulator subdev for act8865) and changing the existing
>   act8865-regulator driver to work as a mfd subdev (platform device)
> 
> - Extending the act8865-regulator driver to register as a platform
>   driver in ADDITION to a i2c driver so it can be used with mfd. The
>   driver already uses regmap so it should only be a matter of adding the
>   pdev probe/remove functions.

After think twice, I think this will complicates the act8865-regulator driver.

Moreover, after following up the Mark's advice, a lot redundant code is removed from act8945a-regulater driver. It is very simple now.

So I think it is better to keep a separate act8945a-regulator driver.

Thank you for detailed description.


Best Regards,
Wenyou Yang