[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160120105302.GE6373@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 11:53:02 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org >> Linux Kernel Mailing List"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: regression 4.4: deadlock in with cgroup percpu_rwsem
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:30:36AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:15:05AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > [ 561.044066] Krnl PSW : 0704e00180000000 00000000001aa1ee (remove_entity_load_avg+0x1e/0x1b8)
>
> > [ 561.044176] ([<00000000001ad750>] free_fair_sched_group+0x80/0xf8)
> > [ 561.044181] [<0000000000192656>] free_sched_group+0x2e/0x58
> > [ 561.044187] [<00000000001ded82>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x3fa/0x928
>
> Urgh,.. lemme stare at that.
Christian, can you test with the remove_entity_load_avg() call removed
from free_fair_sched_group() ?
It will slightly mess up accounting, but should be non fatal and avoids
this current issue.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists