lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160120132433.3d201299@bbrezillon>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:24:33 +0100
From:	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Adam Somerville <adamsomerville@...il.com>
Cc:	"Bean Huo 霍斌斌 (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"zajec5@...il.com" <zajec5@...il.com>,
	"jteki@...nedev.com" <jteki@...nedev.com>,
	"mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com" <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	"furquan@...gle.com" <furquan@...gle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] spi-nor: fix cross die reads on Micron multi-die devices

Adam, Bean,

On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:01:06 +0000
Adam Somerville <adamsomerville@...il.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for looking at the this.
> 
> I can rewrite so it only affects N25Q devices, I hoped a simpler
> implementation would outweigh the small overhead incurred on non
> affected devices.

I tend to think the same way: not sure the performance penalty is worth
the pain.

Best Regards,

Boris

> 
> Do you know if there are any plans for MT25* based multi-die devices
> and if they would have the same issue?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Adam
> 
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Bean Huo 霍斌斌 (beanhuo)
> <beanhuo@...ron.com> wrote:
> > Hi, Adam
> > This is true, but this only exist in Micron 65nm spi nor N25Q.
> > For our 45nm spi nor MT25Q , MT25TL and MT25Q, does exist this question.
> > So I think, can you differentiate between these in your patch?
> >
> >> From: Adam Somerville <adamsomerville@...il.com>
> >>
> >> So as far as I can see there is a bug in the spi-nor driver when issuing die
> >> boundary crossing reads on Micron multi-die devices.
> >> Micron N25Q512A, N25Q00AA and probably any other Micron multi-die
> >> devices do not support a single read request that crosses a die boundary.
> >>
> >> The current behaviour is that the address on the device wraps back to the
> >> start of the first die, with any data returned beyond the boundary being from
> >> the start of the first die.
> >>



-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ