lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1453252038-31915-73-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:05:50 -0800
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.19.y-ckt 072/160] rfkill: copy the name into the rfkill struct

3.19.8-ckt13 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

---8<------------------------------------------------------------

From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>

commit b7bb110008607a915298bf0f47d25886ecb94477 upstream.

Some users of rfkill, like NFC and cfg80211, use a dynamic name when
allocating rfkill, in those cases dev_name(). Therefore, the pointer
passed to rfkill_alloc() might not be valid forever, I specifically
found the case that the rfkill name was quite obviously an invalid
pointer (or at least garbage) when the wiphy had been renamed.

Fix this by making a copy of the rfkill name in rfkill_alloc().

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 net/rfkill/core.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c
index fa7cd79..4b333ed 100644
--- a/net/rfkill/core.c
+++ b/net/rfkill/core.c
@@ -49,7 +49,6 @@
 struct rfkill {
 	spinlock_t		lock;
 
-	const char		*name;
 	enum rfkill_type	type;
 
 	unsigned long		state;
@@ -73,6 +72,7 @@ struct rfkill {
 	struct delayed_work	poll_work;
 	struct work_struct	uevent_work;
 	struct work_struct	sync_work;
+	char			name[];
 };
 #define to_rfkill(d)	container_of(d, struct rfkill, dev)
 
@@ -862,14 +862,14 @@ struct rfkill * __must_check rfkill_alloc(const char *name,
 	if (WARN_ON(type == RFKILL_TYPE_ALL || type >= NUM_RFKILL_TYPES))
 		return NULL;
 
-	rfkill = kzalloc(sizeof(*rfkill), GFP_KERNEL);
+	rfkill = kzalloc(sizeof(*rfkill) + strlen(name) + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!rfkill)
 		return NULL;
 
 	spin_lock_init(&rfkill->lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rfkill->node);
 	rfkill->type = type;
-	rfkill->name = name;
+	strcpy(rfkill->name, name);
 	rfkill->ops = ops;
 	rfkill->data = ops_data;
 
-- 
1.9.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ