linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ideapad-laptop: Add Lenovo Yoga 700 to no_hw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2016 11:49:18 -0500
From:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
To:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ike Panhc <ike.pan@...onical.com>,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
	"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ideapad-laptop: Add Lenovo Yoga 700 to no_hw_rfkill dmi list

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 09:18:10AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org> wrote:
>> > Like the Yoga 900 models the Lenovo Yoga 700 does not have a
>> > hw rfkill switch, and trying to read the hw rfkill switch through the
>> > ideapad module causes it to always reported blocking breaking wifi.
>> >
>> > This commit adds the Lenovo Yoga 700 to the no_hw_rfkill dmi list, fixing
>> > the wifi breakage.
>> >
>> > BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295272
>> > Tested-by: <dinyar.rabady+spam@...il.com>
>> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>> > Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
>> > ---
>> >
>> > This applies to the for-next branch of the platform-x86-drivers tree
>>
>> Just another note that this is actually a new separate entry.  The
>> changelog and DMI information look similar to the patch that was just
>> merged into Linus' tree, but they are different.  This patch isn't a
>> resend.
>
> Yup, understood - I just couldn't include it in yesterday's pull request as it
> came in too late. As a DMI match, it will still make the 4.5 series.

Yep, no worries.  Just wanted to make sure people didn't think it was
a duplicate.

josh