linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yw1x1t9cqg18.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2016 18:09:23 +0000
From:	Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
To:	Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@...madesigns.com>
Cc:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Sebastian Frias <sf84@...oste.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt controller

Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@...madesigns.com> writes:

> On 20/01/2016 17:38, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
>> Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@...madesigns.com> writes:
>> 
>>> On 20/01/2016 17:25, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>>
>>>> Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On 20/01/16 16:10, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &ctl))
>>>>>>>> +		panic("%s: failed to get reg base", node->name);
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +	chip = kzalloc(sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>>>>> +	chip->ctl = ctl;
>>>>>>>> +	chip->base = base;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As I said before, this assumes the outer DT node uses a ranges
>>>>>> property.  Normally reg properties work the same whether they specify an
>>>>>> offset within an outer "ranges" or have a full address directly.  It
>>>>>> would be easy enough to make this work with either, so I don't see any
>>>>>> reason not to.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yup, that is a good point. I guess Marc can address this in the next
>>>>> round, since we need a DT binding anyway.
>>>>
>>>> I'd suggest using of_address_to_resource() on both nodes and subtracting
>>>> the start addresses returned.
>>>
>>> For my own reference, Marc Zyngier suggested:
>>> "you should use of_iomap to map the child nodes, and not mess with
>>> the parent one."
>> 
>> That's going to get very messy since the generic irqchip code needs all
>> the registers as offsets from a common base address.
>
> The two suggestions are over my head at the moment.
>
> Do you want to submit v4 and have Marc Z take a look?

Done.  If this isn't acceptable either, I'm out of ideas that don't end
up being far uglier than anything suggested so far.

-- 
Måns Rullgård