[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1601201509070.2140@knanqh.ubzr>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:14:26 -0500 (EST)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
cc: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rafael@...nel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 2/2] sched: idle: IRQ based next prediction for idle
period
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
[...]
One more comment:
> + /*
> + * If the mean value is null, just ignore this wakeup
> + * source.
> + */
> + mean = stats_mean(&w->stats);
> + if (!mean)
> + continue;
> +
> + variance = stats_variance(&w->stats, mean);
> + /*
> + * We want to check the last interval is:
> + *
> + * mean - stddev < interval < mean + stddev
> + *
> + * That simplifies to:
> + *
> + * -stddev < interval - mean < stddev
> + *
> + * abs(interval - mean) < stddev
> + *
> + * The standard deviation is the sqrt of the variance:
> + *
> + * abs(interval - mean) < sqrt(variance)
> + *
> + * and we want to prevent to do an sqrt, so we square
> + * the equation:
> + *
> + * (interval - mean)^2 < variance
> + *
> + * So if the latest value of the stats complies with
> + * this condition, then the wakeup source is
> + * considered predictable and can be used to predict
> + * the next event.
> + */
> + interval = w->stats.values[w->stats.w_ptr];
> + if ((u64)((interval - mean) * (interval - mean)) > variance)
> + continue;
> +
> + /*
> + * Let's compute the next event: the wakeup source is
> + * considered predictable, we add the average interval
> + * time added to the latest interruption event time.
> + */
> + next = ktime_add_us(w->timestamp, stats_mean(&w->stats));
You don't need to call stats_mean() again as you have it in the 'mean'
variable already.
Nicolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists