linux-kernel - Re: Boot problem on PPC with 4.4-git

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2016 14:40:35 -0600
From:	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Boot problem on PPC with 4.4-git - Bisected to commit 21266be

On 01/20/2016 02:16 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Larry Finger
>> <Larry.Finger@...inger.net> wrote:
>>> My PowerBook G4 Aluminum with a 32-bit PPC processor fails to boot for the
>>> 4.4-git series. The problem was bisected to commit 21266be. It took a while
>>> to figure out why a commit that only rearranges the Kconfig files could
>>> cause the problem.
>>>
>>> The answer came when I read the commit message for 90a545e98126 and saw that
>>> "Recompiling with CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM=n" might be necessary. After I
>>> made that change, the system boots.
>>>
>>> If it is the graphics hardware driver at fault, the VGA controller is listed
>>> as an ATI RV350 [Mobility Radeon 9600 M10] with PCI ID 1002:4350. It uses
>>> radeon as the driver.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if this is a bug in the configuration, but I know that
>>> selecting the default answer to all the new configuration parameters leaves
>>> me with a machine that is unbootable.
>>
>> I agree that the default configuration should remain bootable.  I'll
>> send a change that does not force that default.
>>
>> Thanks for the report and sorry for the inconvenience.
>
> Are you sure that the bisect is pointing to "21266be9ed54 arch:
> consolidate CONFIG_STRICT_DEVM in lib/Kconfig.debug" and not
> "90a545e98126 restrict /dev/mem to idle io memory ranges"?  The
> default for CONFIG_STRICT_DEVM should be unchanged in 21266be9ed54,
> it's not until 90a545e98126 that I would expect a behavior change.

Yes. Commit 21266be9ed54 was the reported bad commit; however, the previous test 
kernel was 90a545e98126. In fact, I was struck that the final bisection build 
did not change any object files, thus you are right that 90a545e98126 is likely 
the bad commit.

Larry