linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAB=NE6VSiQ4Qe9nCEHG1PtTZZrAbLBwcic4LMoayO=0V7OOb6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:49:09 -0800
From:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, mcb30@...e.org,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>, joro@...tes.org,
	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
	andreyknvl@...gle.com, long.wanglong@...wei.com,
	qiuxishi@...wei.com, aryabinin@...tuozzo.com,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
	Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>,
	Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>,
	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 02:16:29PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
>>
>>              A long time ago in a galaxy far,
>>              far away...
>
> :-)
>
> You wouldn't have this on a git tree by any chance?

You bet, refer to "Where to get code alternatively and testing:" on
the original version of this e-mail. As you noted though the i386
change needs the bit for xen subarch, and also the PV enlighten.c code
needs the subarch set too.

> And thank you for doing this!

You did the original nice work on the nice shiny dependency thing,
this just combines it with what ipxe has defined. So thank you!

 Lusi