[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160121070627.GA3365@1wt.eu>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 08:06:27 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
shuah.kh@...sung.com, info@...nelci.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/35] 3.10.95-stable review
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 04:14:51PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 01/20/2016 03:00 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.95 release.
> > There are 35 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri Jan 22 21:19:15 UTC 2016.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/stable-review/patch-3.10.95-rc1.gz
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
>
> Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
And running fine on my laptop FWIW.
Willy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists