[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAtXAHeNXyro3=TOoHehFQMTFdwWD5oBxS3H5cvxiuZx+Zvehw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:44:34 +0100
From: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>
To: Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Josh Cartwright <joshc@...com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>,
"dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com" <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 5/6] fpga: fpga-area and fpga-bus: device tree control
for FPGA
Hi Alan,
minor nits inline:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:24 PM, <atull@...nsource.altera.com> wrote:
> v15: Add altr,fpga-bus implementation
> Change compatible string "fpga-area" -> "altr,fpga-area"
Doesn't look that way down there. Or am I reading the code wrong?
> +static const struct of_device_id fpga_area_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "fpga-area", },
I'm fine with keeping it as fpga-area, this isn't altera specific imho
Cheers,
Moritz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists