lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A0F1CA.4010303@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:57:14 +0100
From:	Stefan Haberland <sth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	keith.busch@...el.com, axboe@...com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [BUG] Regression introduced with "block: split bios to max possible
 length"

Hi,

unfortunately commit e36f62042880 "block: split bios to maxpossible length"
breaks the DASD driver on s390.  We expect the block requests to be multiple
of 4k in size. With the patch applied I see the requests split up in 
multiple
of 512 byte and therefore the requests get rejected and lots of I/Os fail.

Could you please fix or revert the patch?

We have following values set for the block queue:

hw_sector_size         4096
logical_block_size     4096
minimum_io_size        4096
physical_block_size    4096
max_hw_sectors_kb       760
max_sectors_kb          760
max_segment_size       4096
max_segments          65535

Regards,
Stefan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ