linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: Add coupled regulator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160121162802.GL6588@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:28:02 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: Add coupled regulator

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:46:49PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:

> I guess a separate driver would make it easier to deal with cases like
> the one you suggested (shutting down when the load is going to be
> lower). I don't see how we could have a good DT representation of that
> if we're going to use lists.

We can have a driver regardless of what the DT looks like, it's a
question of how things get instantiated.

> Anyway, I'm fine with both approaches, just let me know what you
> prefer.

Without seeing an implementation of the lists it's hard to say.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)