[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A148C2.70709@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 13:08:18 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
Leonid Shatz <leonid.shatz@...ellosystems.com>
Cc: "'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"'Andy Lutomirski'" <luto@...capital.net>,
"'Borislav Petkov'" <bp@...en8.de>,
"'Dave Hansen'" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"'Fenghua Yu'" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"'Linus Torvalds'" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"'Oleg Nesterov'" <oleg@...hat.com>,
"'Peter Zijlstra'" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"'Quentin Casasnovas'" <quentin.casasnovas@...cle.com>,
"'Ravi V. Shankar'" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
"'Sai Praneeth Prakhya'" <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>,
"'Thomas Gleixner'" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
liran.alon@...ellosystems.com, mendel.aizner@...ellosystems.com,
"'Elazar Leibovich'" <elazar.leibovich@...ellosystems.com>,
"'Eyal Moscovici'" <eyal.moscovici@...ellosystems.com>,
gil.hoffer@...ellosystems.com
Subject: Re: Linux patch disabling AVX when eagerfpu is turned off - possibly
not required
On 01/21/16 13:03, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> Hello Leonid,
>
> You are probably right. Let me check this and get back to you.
>
> Thanks,
> Yu-cheng
>
The hardware people have gotten back to us and this inconsistency in the
SDM is unintentional (other places in the SDM has it correctly.) So we
should revert this patch.
-hpa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists