[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <affc672d13100eb0c743b8c7ce88c47a104161bf.1453405861.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:49:30 -0600
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>,
Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 26/33] x86/kvm: Add stack frame dependency to test_cc() inline asm
With some configs, gcc doesn't inline test_cc(). When that happens, it
doesn't create a stack frame before inserting the call instruction.
This breaks frame pointer convention if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled
and can result in a bad stack trace.
Force a stack frame to be created if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled by
listing the stack pointer as an output operand for the inline asm
statement.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index aa4d726..7dba65a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -972,11 +972,13 @@ static int em_bsr_c(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
static u8 test_cc(unsigned int condition, unsigned long flags)
{
u8 rc;
+ register void *__sp asm(_ASM_SP);
void (*fop)(void) = (void *)em_setcc + 4 * (condition & 0xf);
flags = (flags & EFLAGS_MASK) | X86_EFLAGS_IF;
asm("push %[flags]; popf; call *%[fastop]"
- : "=a"(rc) : [fastop]"r"(fop), [flags]"r"(flags));
+ : "=a"(rc), "+r"(__sp)
+ : [fastop]"r"(fop), [flags]"r"(flags));
return rc;
}
--
2.4.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists