[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <bc85501f221ee512670797c7f110022e64b12c81.1453405861.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:49:25 -0600
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org
Cc: Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 21/33] x86/uaccess: Add stack frame output operand in get_user inline asm
From: Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>
Numerous 'call without frame pointer save/setup' warnings are introduced
by stacktool because of functions using the get_user macro. Bad stack
traces could occur due to lack of or misplacement of stack frame setup
code.
This patch forces a stack frame to be created before the inline asm code
if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled by listing the stack pointer as an
output operand for the get_user inline assembly statement.
Signed-off-by: Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 660458a..2584134 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -176,10 +176,11 @@ __typeof__(__builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(x) > sizeof(0UL), 0ULL, 0UL))
({ \
int __ret_gu; \
register __inttype(*(ptr)) __val_gu asm("%"_ASM_DX); \
+ register void *__sp asm(_ASM_SP); \
__chk_user_ptr(ptr); \
might_fault(); \
- asm volatile("call __get_user_%P3" \
- : "=a" (__ret_gu), "=r" (__val_gu) \
+ asm volatile("call __get_user_%P4" \
+ : "=a" (__ret_gu), "=r" (__val_gu), "+r" (__sp) \
: "0" (ptr), "i" (sizeof(*(ptr)))); \
(x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr))) __val_gu; \
__builtin_expect(__ret_gu, 0); \
--
2.4.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists