[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160122075220.GC11301@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 23:52:20 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah.kh@...sung.com, info@...nelci.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/35] 3.10.95-stable review
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 08:06:27AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 04:14:51PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > On 01/20/2016 03:00 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.95 release.
> > > There are 35 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Fri Jan 22 21:19:15 UTC 2016.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/stable-review/patch-3.10.95-rc1.gz
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> > >
> >
> > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
>
> And running fine on my laptop FWIW.
Heh, a laptop on 3.10, hopefully it's old hardware :)
thanks for testing,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists