linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.3 00/55] 4.3.4-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160122081245.GD3162@techsingularity.net>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jan 2016 08:12:45 +0000
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
	shuah.kh@...sung.com, info@...nelci.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.3 00/55] 4.3.4-stable review

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:54:01PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 09:42:53AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 04:43:35PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.3.4 release.
> > 
> > Any particular reason why "[PATCH 4.3-stable 0/5] Disable automatic numa
> > balancing on UMA" was rejected?
> 
> It wasn't "rejected" at all, I have over 500 patches in my stable queue
> right now to dig through. 

Ah, sorry for the misinterpretation.

> That series is still in there, I'll get to
> it, give me a few weeks to catch up, sorry for the delay.
> 

No problem at all. Thanks.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs